Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀüÄ¡ºÎ °³¹æ±³ÇÕÀ» µ¿¹ÝÇÑ °ñ°Ý¼º Á¦3±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ È¯ÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾çÃø ÇϾÇÁö ½Ã»óºÐÇÒ °ñÀý´Ü¼úÈÄ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû ºÐ¼®

Clincal analysis of skeletal stability after BSSRO for correction of skeletal class III malocclusion patients with anterir open bite

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 33±Ç 2È£ p.152 ~ 161
±èÇö¼ö, ÀÌ»óÇÑ, ±ÇÅ°Ç, ±èÁø¼ö, °­µ¿È­, ÀåÇöÁß,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÇö¼ö ( Kim Hyun-Soo ) - Æ÷õÁß¹®ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸¹ÌÂ÷º´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»óÇÑ ( Lee Sang-Han ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±ÇÅ°Ǡ( Kwon Tae-Geon ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁø¼ö ( Kim Chin-Soo ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
°­µ¿È­ ( Kang Dong-Hwa ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀåÇöÁß ( Jang Hyun-Jung ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


This study was conducted to patients visited oral maxillo-facial surgery, KNUH and the purpose of the study was to assess skeletal and dento-alveolar stability after surgical-orthodontic correction treated by skeletal Class III malocclusion patients with open bite versus non-open bite. This retrospective study was based on the examination of 40 patient, 19 males and 21 females, with a mean age 22.3 years. The patients were divided into two groups based on open bite and non-open bite skeletal Class III malocclusion patients. The cephalometric records of 40 skeletal Class III malocclusion patients (open bite: n = 18, non-open bite: n = 22) were examined at different time point, i.e. before surgery(T1), immediately after surgery(T2), one year after surgery(T3). Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy was performed in 40 patients. Rigid internal fixation was standard method used in all patient. Through analysis and evaluation of the cephalometric records, we were able to achieve following results of post-surgical stability and relapse. 1. There was no significant statistical differences between open bite and non-open bite with skeletal Class III malocclusion patients in maxillary occlusal plane angle of pre-operative stage(p>0.05). 2. Mean vertical relapses of skeletal Class III malocclusion patients with open bite were 0.02¡¾1.43mm at B point and 0.42¡¾1.56mm at Pogonion point. In skeletal Class III malocclusion patients with non-open bite, 0.12¡¾1.55mm at B point and 0.08¡¾1.57mm at Pogonion point. There was no significant statistical differences between open bite and non-open bite with skeletal Class III malocclusion patients in vertical relapse(p>0.05). 3. Mean horizontal relapses of skeletal Class III malocclusion patients with open bite were 1.22¡¾2.21mm at B point and 0.74¡¾2.25mm at Pogonion point. In skeletal Class III malocclusion patients with non-open bite, 0.92¡¾1.81mm at B point and 0.83¡¾2.11mm at Pogonion point. There was no significant statistical differences between open bite and non-open bite with skeletal Class III malocclusion patients in horizontal relapse(p>0.05). 4. There were no significant statistical differences between open bite and non-open bite with skeletal Class III malocclusion patients in post-surgical mandibular stability(p>0.05). and we believe this is due to minimized mandibular condylar positional change using mandibular condylar positioning system and also rigid fixation using miniplate 5. Although there was no significant relapse tendency observed at chin points, according to the Pearson correlation analysis, the mandibular relapse was influenced by the amount of vertical and horizontal movement of mandibular set-back(p=0.05, r>0.304).

Å°¿öµå

Anterior open bite;BSSRO;Rigid fixation;Relapse

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed